Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

How much sway case legislation holds may well vary by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances on the current case. To check out this concept, take into account the following case law definition.

ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender plus the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only accomplished In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the instant petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and also private respondents and will just take care of each of the aspects of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Whilst there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is no precedent inside the home state, relevant case regulation from another state could be regarded via the court.

From the United States, persons are not required to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their individual can remember a single rule of thumb when it comes to referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you can, leading the court, not only to the case, but to your section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.

Several judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based over the criminal case are inconsistent with established legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more

In a few jurisdictions, case law might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, guarantee legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair on the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the law laid down from the Supreme Court from the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of the parent department in the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits into the petitioner to which he is entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

Statutory laws are These created by legislative bodies, for example Congress at both the federal and state levels. Though this kind of legislation click here strives to form our society, furnishing rules and guidelines, it would be impossible for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

States also usually have courts that handle only a specific subset of legal matters, such as family regulation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, is definitely the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court as well as the precedent, case legislation could possibly be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision via the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is not strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a single district court in New York is not really binding on another district court, but the original court’s reasoning may help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions through the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more